Hi guys.

You're right, @slugworth: - "A picture is worth 1000 words".
OK, I think that's hapenning because it's calling the STi5516 and mb361 setup. I tried to find where this is but no success.
Any advice, pls?

Best regards.

that would be in the .c and .h files the .lku is made from.
If you only have the .lku you would have to start from scratch
to make your own .lku.

Hi guys.

I'm not sure (I'm not on my home PC) @slugworth but I think that I only have the .lku, so I must start thinking of creating my own. This is not an easy thing to do for a beginner like me and, so far, I've only been able to go as far as simulating the getstart example that comes on Quick Start Guide. I definitely need much more practice on compiling a .lku, but I'm keen on doing so...
Anyway, I will try to give it a go and come back here, if you guys don't mind, looking for guidance whenever I get stuck.
Maybe on another thread for this one is large enough already and also it's somewhat off topic...

Best regards.

It's not easy,I haven't played with .lku making in 2 years and I have no
jtaggable sti5517 based receiver to try it on.In the past I tried helping
people with the sti5107 and sti5119 based receivers and they didn't make
out very well.Often it's just a minor tweak that gets you going,like with the
sti5105 based jtag a delay had to be added to the flash erase/write to get it
to work.Without an actual receiver to play with,I would just be guessing.

Hi guys.

Anyway, I thank you for whatever help you might provide...
By trying this I'll be "playing" for quite a long time, which I find interesting.

Best regards.

I mentioned it before,but a lot of the .h and .c files used to make
the .lku files are from the 1990's and those vintage pc's.
So even if you make a .lku it may only work on slow pc's until you
tweak some more.
Many people actually practice on other sti5518 based receivers,then
graduate to the receiver/processor they actually need to jtag.
A lot more info was available for the sti5518 than the sti5516/17.

Hi guys.

Makes sense working my way through with a 5518 based receiver @slugworth before trying on 5517, but but I don't have any at the moment...
I'll be looking for one.

Best regards.

Preferably an Sti5517KUx....

Hi guys.

Instead of a 5517KUx (I wish...), I'm going to have a 5518 to get my Carnival's bonfire started.
As far as I understand it's still a DCU3 based cpu.
Not the greatest news but good enough...

Best regards.

9u4rk wrote:

QUOTE:
Hi guys.

As far as I understand it's still a DCU3 based cpu.

If it were we wouldn't be having this conversation.
Sti5518 is the original dcu based, not dcu3,that is why jkeys ,skymax and other jtag programs work with it.
But there are lku based burners that work and have the sourcecode,so it is regarded
as a training tool for making same even though using jkeys is much easier.

Hello good afternoon everyone, continuing with the test sti5517 already damaging two boards n3, came a new version of EJTAG (04/02/2010
Version 0.1.0.1427 CPLD EJTAG
Added work with ST20c1 DCU3 (sti5119, 5105,5517, etc.).
Rewritten work with files (now working through the mapping file into memory)
that supposedly supports the ST20 c1 sti5xxx conform image attachment, do not know whether it is fake, but the friend @ Slugworth will be more comfortable talking about this soft for me,

I take it I'm also having trouble in STI5100 dcu3 and have problems in setting the flash 28F640J3 *. def jkeys, and have the id but the error selecting this flash
thank aid
Thank you and sorry for my bad English
Regards
Onsitbin

Please remove post nª 309

error C/P

sorry

tanks
Onsitbin

Hello @Onsitbin

Thanks for the info.
Despite of the fact that I successfully registered on the russian web site, I'm still not allowed to download that promising program.

On your Sti5100.
Could you specify the suffix?
Is that a Sti5100KUx ?

I could be wrong but I think that was the usb version that you had to pay for,
not free or public.

Hi guys.
slugworth wrote:

QUOTE:
9u4rk wrote:
[...] But there are lku based burners that work and have the sourcecode,so it is regarded as a training tool for making same even though using jkeys is much easier.

Thx for clarifying that for me @slugworth, I was thinking otherwise...
When I get the 5518 I'll come back to the subject.

I think you need to wait several days and be posting to be allowed to download any files from that site, @YLG80.

Best regards.

That EJTAG version looks interesting.
A bit difficult to interpret the russian buttons.
But it looks like it has really the DCU3 capability.
I guess I don't have the right interface to work with that program because I get multiple timeout errors.
But it recognizes the CPU on the second tab although it does not print the correct CPU id in the logger window.

(There is a strange message from Avira when downloading that file :
Compressed with an odd runtime algorithm : pck/obsidium.
Avira does not like that and erase the executable)

YLG80 wrote:

QUOTE:
Hello @Onsitbin

Thanks for the info.
Despite of the fact that I successfully registered on the russian web site, I'm still not allowed to download that promising program.

On your Sti5100.
Could you specify the suffix?
Is that a Sti5100KUx ?

Hello dear @YLG80 already sent you a PM, my processor is Sti5100Luc
Tanks

the tiny tools is only for dcu3 core1 judging from the screenshot.
The sti5517 and the sti5100 are core2 so not doable with that program.
The sti5105 to sti5119 are core1 dcu3.

YLG80 wrote:

QUOTE:
That EJTAG version looks interesting.
A bit difficult to interpret the russian buttons.
But it looks like it has really the DCU3 capability.
I guess I don't have the right interface to work with that program because I get multiple timeout errors.
But it recognizes the CPU on the second tab although it does not print the correct CPU id in the logger window.

(There is a strange message from Avira when downloading that file :
Compressed with an odd runtime algorithm : pck/obsidium.
Avira does not like that and erase the executable)

If it is like the old ejatg_tt the jtag wiring isn't standard.
A buffered jtag was a must when I was playing with the old ejtag_tt and conexant
processors.It was no speed demon back then either.

CPLD EJTAG 0.1.0.1427 - ST20c1 DCU3 (sti5119,5105,5517,...)

http://rapidshare.com/files/347737793/CPLD_EJTAG_0_1_.1.0.1427.rar.html

QUOTE:
http://rapidshare.com/files/347737793/CPLD_EJTAG_0_1_.1.0.1427.rar.html